Table 2

SLICC criteria, autoantibody specificities and medication history in patients with SLE and ILE based on SLICC and 1997 ACR criteria

SLESLICC-only† (n=178)SLEACR-only‡ (n=85)SLEboth§ (n=3312)ILE¶ (n=291)
SLICC clinical criteria
 Number positive, mean2.062.27
p=0.244
4.15
p<0.0001
1.45
p<0.0001
 Acute/subacute cutaneous rashes, n (%)76 (42.7)71 (83.5)
p<0.0001
2514 (75.9)
p<0.0001
124 (42.6)
p=0.986
 Chronic cutaneous rashes, n (%)10 (5.6)6 (7.1)
p=0.648
562 (17.0)
p<0.001
26 (8.9)
p=0.194
 Oral/nasal ulcers, n (%)11 (6.2)13 (15.3)
p=0.020
934 (28.2)
p<0.0001
31 (10.6)
p=0.104
 Alopecia, n (%)46 (25.8)6 (7.1)
p=0.001
1248 (37.7)
p=0.002
2 (0.7)
p<0.0001
 Arthritis, n (%)67 (37.6)46 (54.1)
p=0.012
2344 (70.8)
p<0.0001
131 (45.0)
p=0.117
 Serositis, n (%)10 (5.6)9 (10.6)
p=0.152
1198 (36.2)
p<0.0001
17 (5.8)
p=0.920
 Renal, n (%)23 (12.9)9 (10.6)
p=0.589
1262 (38.1)
p<0.0001
13 (4.5)
p=0.001
 Neurological, n (%)22 (12.4)5 (5.9)
p=0.113
585 (17.7)
p=0.071
4 (1.4)
p<0.001
 Anaemia, n (%)*3 (1.7)0 (0.0)
p=0.553
253 (7.6)
p=0.007
1 (0.3)
p=0.166
 Leucopenia/lymphopenia, n (%)83 (46.6)26 (30.6)
p=0.014
2339 (70.6)
p<0.0001
67 (23.0)
p<0.0001
 Thrombocytopenia, n (%)16 (9.0)2 (2.4)
p=0.064
498 (15.0)
p=0.029
5 (1.7)
p=0.001
SLICC immunological criteria
 Number positive, mean2.540.90
p<0.0001
2.86
p<0.001
1.25
p<0.0001
 ANA, n (%)176 (98.9)74 (87.1)
p=0.001
3299 (99.6)
p=0.165
280 (96.2)
p=0.109
 Anti-dsDNA, n (%)93 (52.2)2 (2.4)
p<0.0001
2128 (64.3)
p=0.001
34 (11.7)
p<0.0001
 Anti-Sm, n (%)32 (18.0)1 (1.2)
p=0.004
807 (24.4)
p=0.053
8 (2.8)
p<0.0001
 Antiphospholipid, n (%)*67 (37.6)0 (0.0)
p<0.0001
1016 (30.7)
p=0.051
39 (13.4)
p<0.0001
 Complement, n (%)*81 (45.5)0 (0.0)
p<0.0001
1884 (56.9)
p=0.003
3 (1.0)
p<0.0001
 Coombs, n (%)*3 (1.7)0 (0.0)
p=0.553
323 (9.8)
p=0.002
0 (0.0)
p=0.054
Autoantibody specificities**
 Number positive, median10
p=0.004
2
p<0.0001
1
p<0.0001
 dsDNA, n (%)37 (22.7)1 (1.6)
p=0.005
803 (30.2)
p=0.043
13 (4.5)
p<0.0001
 Chromatin, n (%)62 (38.0)12 (19.0)
p=0008
1433 (53.9)
p=0.0001
47 (16.4)
p<0.0001
 Ribosomal P, n (%)9 (5.5)2 (3.2)
p=0.468
355 (13.4)
p=0.005
3 (1.0)
p=0.011
 Ro/SSA, n (%)48 (29.4)16 (25.4)
p=0.545
1049 (39.5)
p=0.011
64 (22.4)
p=0.097
 La/SSB, n (%)17 (10.4)4 (6.3)
p=0.348
388 (14.6)
p=0.142
24 (8.4)
p=0.472
 Sm, n (%)24 (14.7)4 (6.3)
p=0.096
726 (27.3)
p=0.0005
17 (5.9)
p=0.003
 SmRNP, n (%)45 (27.6)11 (17.5)
p=0.116
1056 (39.7)
p=0.002
35 (12.2)
p<0.0001
 RNP, n (%)44 (27.0)12 (19.0)
p=0.217
954 (35.9)
p=0.022
45 (15.7)
p=0.004
 Centromere B, n (%)6 (3.7)2 (3.2)
p=0.853
100 (3.8)
p=0.957
19 (6.6)
p=0.194
 Scl-70, n (%)6 (3.7)2 (3.2)
p=0.854
72 (2.7)
p=0.465
6 (2.1)
p=0.323
 Jo-1, n (%)*0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
p=1.000
8 (0.3)
p=1.000
2 (0.7)
p=0.537
Medications used
 Number, median22
p=0.212
3
p<0.0001
2
p<0.0001
 None, n (%)12 (6.7)4 (4.7)
p=0.052
34 (1.0)
p<0.0001
45 (15.5)
p=0.006
 Hydroxychloroquine, n (%)133 (74.7)66 (77.6)
p=0.605
2755 (83.2)
p=0.004
173 (59.4)
p<0.0001
 Steroids, n (%)147 (82.6)67 (78.8)
p=0.464
3105 (93.8)
p<0.0001
187 (64.3)
p<0.0001
 Immunosuppressants, n (%)60 (33.7)25 (29.4)
p=0.486
1683 (50.8)
p<0.0001
80 (27.5)
p=0.154
 Major immunosuppressants, n (%)41 (23.0)11 (12.9)
p=0.058
1309 (39.5)
p<0.0001
30 (10.3)
p<0.001
  • Bold p values are significant (p<0.05) for comparison with SLESLICC-only by logistic regression or by Fisher's exact test where indicated (*) due to a 0 value. Note that power may be inadequate to detect differences when events are rare, particularly when the total n is also low, as for SLEACR-only.

  • †SLESLICC-only were classified with SLE by SLICC criteria, but not ACR criteria.

  • ‡SLEACR-only were classified with SLE by ACR criteria, but not SLICC criteria.

  • §SLEboth were classified with SLE by both SLICC and ACR criteria.

  • ¶Patients with ILE met three ACR criteria and were not classified with SLE by SLICC criteria.

  • **Determined by in-house, multiplex, bead-based assay.

  • ACR, American College of Rheumatology; ILE, incomplete lupus erythematosus; SLICC, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics.