Editorial
Clinical outcomes in VBAC attempts: what to say to patients?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.040Get rights and content

References (5)

  • M. Landon et al.

    Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • G.A. Macones et al.

    Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2005)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (12)

  • Contemporary labor patterns: The impact of maternal body mass index

    2011, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States

    2010, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is consistent with our finding that the rate was 28.8% in 2005-2007, and ours may be an overestimate for the national level because academic institutions are overrepresented in our study. The low rate of trial of labor has been attributed in part to a slight increase in absolute risks of maternal and neonatal morbidity, professional liability concerns and physician and patient's attitude toward VBAC.5 The recent change in ACOG recommendations also has reduced the availability of VBAC services in many hospitals.13

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text