Discussion
Here, we demonstrated, for the first time, the antiplatelet effects of HCQ in patients with SLE under conditions closely simulating the physiological environment by using T-TAS. The main results obtained were as follows: (1) PL-AUC10 was significantly lower in the HCQ/RBW ≥5 mg/kg group than in the <5 mg/kg group, while T10 was similar, indicating that HCQ inhibited overall thrombus formation rather than the initiation of thrombus formation; (2) the results from the association analysis of PL-AUC10 and the dose of HCQ suggested that the antiplatelet effects of HCQ were initially detected at HCQ/RBW of approximately 4 mg/kg and reached a plateau at around 5.5 mg/kg, and the administration of HCQ/RBW >4.6 mg/kg induced an obvious antiplatelet effect; (3) PL-AUC10 in patients with SLE were not affected by organ complications, comorbidities, autoantibodies, glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents; (4) HCQ inhibited overall thrombus formation in T-TAS and the platelet aggregation response to epinephrine in a dose-dependent manner; and (5) the data analysed by IBW were similar to those by RBW.
The platelet aggregation assay is considered the historical standard for a platelet function test.22 However, this assay evaluates the aggregates that form only after the addition of platelet aggregating agents under conditions where platelets are isolated from other whole blood components. Furthermore, these aggregates are not formed under high shear stress. Therefore, these conditions do not wholly replicate the process of platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation as they naturally occur in the physiological environment.22 In addition, due to the complexity of the procedures and conditions, adverse events may occur. Cornwell et al reported that HCQ reduced ADP-induced platelet aggregation.20 In contrast, Achuthan et al showed that HCQ significantly reduced platelet aggregation with arachidonic acid (AA), while HCQ did not show a significant reduction in platelet aggregation with ADP or collagen.19
T-TAS is an instrument that is capable of quantitatively analysing the formation of platelet thrombi at high shear stress, which corresponds to arterial wall shear stress, by applying whole blood to microchips coated with collagen.23 T-TAS comprehensively analyses platelet function, including platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation, under conditions that more closely resemble the physiological environment. In addition to the points described above, the advantages of T-TAS over the platelet aggregation assay are its ease of use and stability. In contrast, the disadvantage of this system is that it is unable to specifically evaluate the activity of a pathway that may be targeted by an antiplatelet agent; however, it has the ability to assess overall thrombogenicity. In addition, the analytical conditions of T-TAS are not suitable for samples with low platelet counts or low Ht levels.
Recent studies using T-TAS have been reported. T-TAS was shown to be useful for diagnosing von Willebrand disease and patients suspected of platelet function defects.24 25 T-TAS was also a useful index for evaluating the total effects of dual antiplatelet agents in patients with various CVD.26 27 In the present study, we detected the dose-dependent antiplatelet effects of HCQ in patients with SLE by using T-TAS. PL-AUC10 was significantly lower in the HCQ/RBW ≥5 mg/kg group than in the <5 mg/kg group, while T10 did not significantly differ between these groups. This result indicates that HCQ inhibits thrombus growth rather than the initiation of thrombus formation because PL-AUC10 and T10 reflect total thrombogenicity and the onset of platelet thrombus formation, respectively. PL-AUC10 in patients with SLE was not associated with organ complications, comorbidities, autoantibodies, glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents, except for BLM. BLM non-users had significantly lower PL-AUC10 than BLM users. However, this difference did not appear to be due to the absence of BLM, but rather to the higher number of patients receiving HCQ ≥5 mg/kg among BLM non-users, which may have led to the decrease in PL-AUC10. Therefore, BLM was considered to have no effect on PL-AUC10.
The platelet aggregation assay provides information primarily related to the pathways affected by antiplatelet agents because it assesses responses to various aggregating agents. In the present study, HCQ decreased the platelet aggregation response to epinephrine in a dose-dependent manner. Since epinephrine is a stimulant of the AA cascade,35 the antiplatelet effects of HCQ may be involved in this cascade. Although the mechanisms underlying the antiplatelet effects of HCQ have not yet been elucidated in detail, previous studies reported the involvement of HCQ in the AA cascade, such as the inhibition of phospholipase A2, AA release and thromboxane A2-induced platelet aggregation.19 36 37 Based on these findings and the present results, HCQ appears to inhibit thrombus growth through its effects on the AA cascade. Therefore, the combination of T-TAS and the platelet aggregation assay provides comprehensive information on primary haemostasis.
HCQ exerts immunomodulatory effects, such as the alkalinisation of lysosomes with interference in phagocytosis and the suppression of inflammatory cytokine production,38 which reduces SLE flares by 50%4 and prolongs the long-term survival of patients with SLE.5–7 On the other hand, retinopathy has been identified as a major side effect of HCQ.39 Melles et al reported that the risk of retinal toxicity in patients with a mean daily use of HCQ/RBW >5 mg/kg, 4.0–5.0 mg/kg and<4.0 mg/kg was approximately 10%, less than 2% and almost 0% within 10 years of treatment, respectively, and approximately 40, 20 and 6% after 20 years, respectively, suggesting that the risk of toxicity is very low for doses <5 mg/kg.39 On the other hand, Jorge et al demonstrated that HCQ/RBW ≤5 mg/kg was associated with an adjusted OR of 1.98 for any SLE flare relative to >5 mg/kg, indicating that the threshold for flares is approximately 5 mg/kg.40 Based on these findings, the recommended dose of HCQ has undergone a shift from ‘should not exceed 5 mg/kg (RBW)’ in the 2019 EULAR recommendations41 to ‘a target dose of 5 mg/kg (RBW)’ in the 2023 EULAR recommendations.14 In the present study, we found that the antiplatelet effects of HCQ were initially detected at HCQ/RBW of approximately 4 mg/kg and reached a plateau at around 5.5 mg/kg, and the administration of HCQ/RBW >4.6 mg/kg exerted an obvious antiplatelet effect. Collectively, previous findings and the present results indicate that a HCQ dose of 5 mg/kg (RBW) may not only contribute to the control of disease activity, but also exert antiplatelet effects.
The present study has several limitations that need to be addressed. We did not monitor HCQ concentrations in the whole blood of patients with SLE. Therefore, we were unable to evaluate adherence to HCQ based on blood concentration monitoring. Moreover, medication adherence was neither supervised nor secured by medication boxes; however, we confirmed medication adherence both verbally and with the MGLS. Consequently, in the present study, we classified HCQ users into two subgroups based on the prescribed HCQ dose per RBW. Furthermore, we did not examine the relationship between T-TAS measurements and clinical outcomes, such as cardiovascular events, due to the cross-sectional design of the study. In addition, since the extent to which PL-AUC10 indicates thrombogenicity has not yet been examined, it is impossible to assess the extent of the antiplatelet effects of HCQ in clinical practice. The identification of an ideal PL-AUC10 for the prevention of cardiovascular events may lead to future therapeutic strategies that prevent CVD based on the optimal use of HCQ and antiplatelet agents. Moreover, this was a single centre study and all subjects were Japanese (Asian background), and its sample size was relatively small because patients with low platelet counts, low Ht levels or antiplatelet agents were excluded. In the present study, most patients with SLE were in remission or had low disease activity. Therefore, we were unable to evaluate PL-AUC10 in patients with high disease activity, which is a known risk factor for cardiovascular events. To address these limitations, a multinational, multicentre prospective study that investigates the relationships among T-TAS measurements, HCQ concentrations, high disease activity and clinical outcomes is needed in the future.
In conclusion, we demonstrated the dose-dependent antiplatelet effects of HCQ under conditions simulating the physiological environment by using T-TAS. T-TAS has potential as a useful tool for evaluating thrombogenicity in various collagen diseases.