Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P134 Factors associated with discordance between patient and physician perception of disease activity among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an international collaborative study
  1. Shounak Ghosh1,
  2. Rajagopal Sankara Narayanan2,
  3. Katie Bechman3,
  4. Ioannis Parodis4,
  5. Esha Kadam5,
  6. Wanruchada Katchamart6,
  7. Phonpen Akarawatcharangura Goo7,
  8. Abraham Edgar Gracia-Ramos8,
  9. Parikshit Sen9,
  10. Elena Nikiphorou3,
  11. Sreoshy Saha10,
  12. Ai Lyn Tan11,
  13. Tsvetelina Velikova12,
  14. Marcin Milchert13,
  15. Johannes Knitza14,
  16. Carlo Caballero15,
  17. Dey Dzifa16,
  18. Hector Chinoy17,
  19. COVADStudy Group18,
  20. Rohit Aggarwal19,
  21. Vikas Agarwal20,
  22. Latika Gupta21 and
  23. Chris Wincup22
  1. 1CMRI Hospital, Kolkata, India
  2. 2Narayana Medical College, Nellore, India
  3. 3King’s College London, London, UK
  4. 4Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  5. 5Seth Gordhandhas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edwards Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
  6. 6Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  7. 7Dept. of Medicine, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Chonburi, Thailand
  8. 8Dept. of Internal Medicine, General Hospital, National Medical Center ‘La Raza’, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
  9. 9Maulana Azad Medical College, 2-Bahadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, Dalhi, India
  10. 10Mymensingh Medical College, Faridpur, Bangladesh
  11. 11University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  12. 12Dept. of Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital ‘Lozenetz’, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria
  13. 13Dept. of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Diabetology, Geriatrics and Clinical Immunology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
  14. 14Dept. of Internal Medicine 3 Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  15. 15Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia
  16. 16Dept. of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Ghana School of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, Korle-Bu, Accra, Ghana
  17. 17The University of Manchester, Sale, UK
  18. 18
  19. 19University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
  20. 20Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow, India
  21. 21Royal Wolverhampton Trust, Wolverhampton/University of Manchester, UK
  22. 22King’s College Hospital, London, UK

Abstract

Objective The management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) relies on accurately evaluating disease activity. However discordance between physician and patient perceptions of disease activity are frequently observed. With the increasing prevalence of virtual consultations, understanding factors contributing to this discordance in patient perceived disease activity is crucial. This global study aimed to identify predictors of patient-physician discordance in a large global SLE population.

Methods Data was collected from the COVAD study, a collaborative international survey with 17,000 participants (1292 with SLE). Variables included disease duration, symptoms, comorbidities, medication, and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were recorded. Patient perception of disease activity was self-reported, while physician-defined activity required a new symptom of active SLE and a change in immunosuppressive medication within the preceding 6 months. Participants were categorized as Concordant Active, Discordant, or Concordant Inactive. Differences between groups was evaluated using Chi Square and t-test. Cramer’s phi was used to assess strength on concordance between patient and physician reported disease activity.

Results Among the 1292 SLE patients included in the study, 5.1% were Concordant Active (i.e. both patient and physician were in agreement that the disease was active), 49.46% were Concordant Inactive (both in agreement that the disease was not active), and 45.43% were Discordant (where the patient felt their SLE was active but they did not meet physician criteria for active disease). Weak association (Cramer’s phi = 0.16) was observed between Physician Active and Patient Active disease. The key differences noted in those with discordance in perceived disease activity are summarised in figure 1. Discordance was higher in Caucasian patients with inactive disease (p<0.0001), while other ethnicities were more likely to be concordant. Steroid and immunosuppressive use correlated with discordance, whereas patients on no treatment were more likely concordant with physician assessment. Symptomatic drivers of discordance included fatigue, pain, and Global Mental Health scores (p<0.0001).

Conclusion Nearly half of SLE patients perceive active disease when physicians deem it inactive, particularly in those experiencing high fatigue, pain, and poorer mental health. These findings emphasise the importance of recognising patient-reported symptoms, especially in virtual consultations, to enhance comprehensive disease management in SLE.

Abstract P134 Figure 1

Patients who reported active disease (in the context of physician defined inactive disease, i.e. discordant) reported high levels of Pain (A), Fatigue (B) and had poorer mental health (C) and physical function (D) than those with concordant inactive disease (in which both patient and physician agreed the disease was not active). There was no significant difference in PROMIS Physical Health Score (E), Age (F) or Disease Duration (G). ns, not significant; **** p<0.0001

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.