Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P163 Efficacy of deucravacitinib, a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in musculoskeletal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: a subanalysis of the phase 2 PAISLEY study
  1. Marilyn Pike1,
  2. Amit Saxena2,
  3. Richard Furie3,
  4. Peter Nash4,
  5. Thomas Dörner5,
  6. Coburn Hobar6,
  7. Samantha Pomponi6,
  8. Ravi Koti7,
  9. Subhashis Banerjee6,
  10. Thomas Wegman6 and
  11. Joan Merrill8
  1. 1Rheumatology, MedPharm Consulting, Inc, Raleigh, NC, USA
  2. 2Dept. of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
  3. 3Rheumatology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA
  4. 4Dept. of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
  5. 5Charité University Hospitals, Berlin, Germany
  6. 6Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
  7. 7Syneos Health, Morrisville, NC, USA
  8. 8Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation Oklahoma City, OK, USA

Abstract

Objective Deucravacitinib, a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor targets select immune pathways relevant to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In the 48-week, double-blind, phase 2 PAISLEY trial for patients with active SLE (NCT03252587), a greater proportion of patients randomized to deucravacitinib 3 mg BID met the primary endpoint of the SLE Responder Index-4 and all key secondary endpoints, including global disease activity measures. This post-hoc subanalysis focuses on musculoskeletal manifestations in the PAISLEY study.

Methods Patients receiving standard-of-care were randomized 1:1:1:1 to placebo (n=90) or deucravacitinib 3 mg BID (n=91), 6 mg BID (n=93), or 12 mg QD (n=89). A 40-joint count measured joint swelling, tenderness, or both. Outcomes included achievement of ≥50% reduction (JC-50) and 100% reduction (JC-100) in active joint count (swollen+tender; AJC-50 and AJC-100, respectively), swollen joint count (SJC), and tender joint count (TJC) in patients with ≥6 joints involved at baseline or patients with any joint involvement at baseline. Responses were reported with a prespecified nonresponder imputation. The 2-sided 95% CI for responses was calculated using the asymptotic (including continuity) method. Results were descriptive.

Results At week 32 (primary endpoint analysis time point), more patients with ≥6 active joints at baseline receiving deucravacitinib achieved AJC-50 vs placebo (placebo, 45.3%; deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 63.5%; 6 mg BID, 64.6%; 12 mg QD, 56.5%; figure 1A), expanding previously reported JC-50 findings at week 48. Patients with any joint involvement at baseline receiving deucravacitinib achieved AJC-50 more often vs placebo (week 32: placebo, 48.3%; deucravacitinib 3 mg BID, 63.3%; 6 mg BID, 63.4%; 12 mg QD, 53.4%) through week 48 (figure 1B). AJC-100 results were similar to AJC-50 results in both populations through week 48 (figure 1C and 1D). Consistent patterns of higher JC-50 and JC-100 responses with deucravacitinib were observed in separate analyses of SJC and TJC through week 48 (figure 2).

Conclusion Deucravacitinib was associated with reductions in joint counts vs placebo using a range of assessment time points, different joint assessments, and different cutoffs for musculoskeletal involvement at baseline.

Abstract P163 Figure 1

AJC-50 and AJC-100 responses from baseline to week 48

Abstract P163 Figure 2

JC-50 and JC-100 responses at week 48 for SJC and TJC assessments

Acknowledgements We thank the patients and their families who made this study possible, as well as the clinical teams who participated. This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Professional medical writing assistance was provided by Stephanie V. Koebele, PhD, of SciMentum, Inc, a Nucleus Group Holdings, Inc, company, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

COI Disclosures

  • MP: Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and UCB

  • AS: Advisory board: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, GSK, and Kezar Life Sciences

  • RF: Research/grant support and consultancy: Bristol Myers Squibb

  • PN: Research/grant support and consultancy: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Servatus, and UCB

  • TD: Research/grant support: AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, UCB, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and EU Horizon/HarmonicSS. Advisory boards/panels: AbbVie, Aurinia, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, and UCB

  • CH, SP, SB, and TW: Employee and shareholder: Bristol Myers Squibb

  • RK: Employee: Syneos Health, providing statistical services to Bristol Myers Squibb

  • JM: Consultancy: AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Equillium, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, IQVIA, Janssen, Eli Lilly, LFA, Merck, Provention, Remegen, Sanofi, Takeda, and Zenas

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.