Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P71 Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and related costs of patients with discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) or subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) in the United States: a cohort study in the Merative™ MarketScan® database
  1. Caroline Foch1,
  2. Sabrina de Souza1,
  3. Ying Sun2,
  4. Xiaoxue Chen3,
  5. Sanjeev Roy4,
  6. Dominika Weinelt5,
  7. Jeffrey M Muir6 and
  8. Benjamin F Chong7
  1. 1Clinical Science Measurement, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  2. 2Global Value Demonstration, Market Access and Pricing, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  3. 3North America Evidence and Value Development, EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
  4. 4Global Clinical Development – Immunology, Ares Trading SA, Eysins, Switzerland, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
  5. 5Global Patient Safety, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
  6. 6Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Cytel, Inc., Toronto, Canada
  7. 7Dept. of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA

Abstract

Objective To describe treatment patterns and the economic burden of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) using data from a large, commercial insurance database in the United States. Existing data are relatively scarce and outdated.

Methods Adults with ≥1 inpatient diagnosis or ≥2 outpatient diagnoses (minimum 30 days/maximum 365 days apart) of DLE (ICD-10: L93.0, H01.12) or SCLE (ICD-10: L93.1) between 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2021 were selected from the MerativeTM Marketscan® US medical claims database. The frequency and rate of dispensed prescriptions, annualized health service utilization, and annualized direct healthcare costs were described. Subgroup analysis among patients with/without concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; ICD-10: M32) was performed.

Results The study included 11,932 patients with DLE and 1634 with SCLE; 47.6% and 30.6%, respectively, had a prior co-diagnosis of SLE. Glucocorticoids were the predominate treatment (table 1). Hydroxychloroquine was used in 58.0% of patients with DLE (DLE with SLE: 68.7%, DLE without SLE: 43.3%) and 65.4% with SCLE (SCLE with SLE: 74.4%, SCLE without SLE: 58.6%). Mean annualized outpatient visits were 31.87 for DLE and 28.19 for SLE, and mean length of hospital stay was 12.4 and 8.1 days, respectively. Respective mean annualized direct costs of $44,188 and $30,219 were reported (DLE with SLE: $63,039, DLE without SLE: $27,056; SCLE with SLE: $45,958, SCLE without SLE: $23,177). Costs were driven largely by outpatient claims (figure 1). During the observation period, 21.7% of DLE and 18.2% of SCLE patients who initially did not have an SLE co-diagnosis were diagnosed with SLE.

Conclusions A substantial proportion of CLE patients developed concomitant SLE, which drove medical resource utilization and costs, resulting in an economic burden 3–4 times higher than that previously reported.

Acknowledgements Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945) sponsored the study and funded editorial support by Bioscript Group.

Abstract P71 Table 1

Percentage of DLE and SCLE patients prescribed glucocorticoids

Abstract P71 Figure 1

Annual per-patient overall direct costs for DLE (A) and SCLE (B) were driven largely by outpatient costs. Inpatient costs were proportionately higher for DLE. Pharmacy costs were proportionately higher for SCLE. Emergency department costs were relatively low. All values shown in USD.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ .

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.