Article Text

Download PDFPDF

501 Association between ultra-processed food intake with risk of systemic lupus erythematosus in women
  1. Sinara Laurini Rossato1,
  2. Chun-Han Lo2,
  3. Medha Barbhaiya3,
  4. Jeffrey A Sparks4,
  5. Neha Khandpur5,
  6. Susan Malspeis4,
  7. Kazuki Yoshida4,
  8. Walter C Willett5,6,7 and
  9. Karen H Costenbader4
  1. 1Institute of Geography, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA
  3. 3Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
  4. 4Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
  5. 5Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
  6. 6Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
  7. 7Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Background Antioxidants and vitamins present in unprocessed foods may protect against development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) whereas ultra-processed foods (UPFs) remove these nutrients, adding stabilizers and emulsifiers, and may thus increase SLE risk. We assessed the association of UPF intake and SLE incidence in two cohorts of women with more than 20 years of follow-up.

Methods We included 78,911 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) followed from 1984 to 2010 and 91,079 women in NHS II followed 1991 to 2015. Diet was assessed using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire and the NOVA food classification system was used to categorize food intake and quantity into UPF. UPFs are ready-to-eat industrial formulations that normally contain added flavors, and cosmetic additives (e.g. sugar- sweetened beverages, muffins, bagels, candies, salad dressing, and processed meat). Participants who reported new doctor-diagnosed connective tissue disease (CTD) including SLE on one of the two-year medical assessment follow-ups completed the Connective Tissue Disease Questionnaire and cases were confirmed on medical record review. Time-varying Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incident SLE. UPF intake, assessed as number of servings/day in tertiles, was the exposure. Models were adjusted for age, race, cohort, total energy intake, household income, smoking, body mass index (BMI in kg/m2), physical activity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive, multivitamin, and menopausal hormone status. We investigated effect modification by BMI in stratified models.

Results Mean age at baseline was ~50 years old in NHS and ~36 years old in NHSII. (table 1) Participants were predominantly White (90–95%). In the pooled analysis of NHS and NHSII, 200 cases of SLE were identified over 26 years follow-up in NHS and 24 years in NHSII. After multivariable adjustment, risk was higher in the 3rd than 1st UPF intake tertile (HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.03 - 2.05, p 0.03). For positive dsDNA SLE risk, the risk was also higher 1st vs. 3rd tertile (HR 1.62, 95%CI 0.98 - 2.69, p 0.05) (table 2). Participants with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 had higher SLE risk in the 3rd vs. 1st tertile of UPF intake servings/day (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.03 -2.67, p 0.02) than among those with lower BMI (figure 1).

Conclusion Women in the highest tertile of cumulatively updated dietary UPF intake/day were at almost 50% greater risk of developing SLE compared to women in the lowest tertile of UPF daily intake. In addition, elevated SLE risk associated with high UPF intake was more significant among participants with overweight and obesity than among those with normal BMI. These novel findings deserve further study.

Abstract 501 Table 1

Age-standardized characteristics in Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) 1984 and Nurses’ Health Study-II (NHSII) 1991, according to tertiles of Ultra-Processed food (UPF) intake (1= lowest and 3 highest intake)

Abstract 501 Table 2

Hazard Ratios and 95% confidence intervals for Risk of SLE according to tertiles of ultra- processed food intake (1=lowest and 3=highest) among women followed in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Nurses’ Health Study II combined

Abstract 501 Figure 1

Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) according to tertiles of ultra-processed food intake among women followed in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Nurses’ Health Study II , stratified by body mass index. Tertile 1 as the reference category (lowest intake) to Tertile 3 (highest intake).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.