Article Text

Download PDFPDF

384 Multi-specialists’ perspectives on clinical decision making in systemic lupus erythematosus: an interview study
  1. D Tunnicliffe1,2,
  2. D Singh-Grewal3,4,5,
  3. JC Craig1,2,
  4. S Jesudason6,
  5. M.W Lin3,7,
  6. S O’Neill4,8,
  7. D Sumpton1,2,8 and
  8. A Tong1,2
  1. 1University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Centre for Kidney Research, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
  4. 4The University of New South Wales, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
  5. 5The Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Department of Rheumatology, Sydney, Australia
  6. 6Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Adelaide, Australia
  7. 7Westmead Hospital, Department of Immunology, Sydney, Australia
  8. 8Liverpool Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Sydney, Australia


Background and aims Clinicians from different medical specialists are involved in the management of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), however, unwarranted variation in practice remains largely unexplained. This study aims to describe specialists’ attitudes and perspectives on the management of patients with SLE.

Methods Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with rheumatologists, nephrologists, and immunologists providing care to adult patients with SLE from 19 centres across Australia. All interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically.

Results The 43 participants (Table 1) identified five themes and subthemes: uncertainties in judgements (hampered by unknown and unclear aetiology, inapplicable evidence, comprehending information dispersion); reflexive responses (anchoring to speciality training, anticipating outcomes, avoiding disaster, empathy for the vulnerable); overarching duty to patients (achieving patient priorities, maximising adherence, controlling the disease, legitimate educator, having adequate and relevant expertise); safeguarding professional opportunities (diversifying clinical skills, protecting colleagues’ interests); and optimising access to treatment (capitalising on multidisciplinary care, acquiring breakthrough therapies). Illustrative quotations are provided in Table 2, and patterns and relationships among all themes are shown in Figure 1.

Abstract 384 Table 1

Participant characteristics (n=3)

Abstract 384 Table 2

Illustrative quatations

Abstract 384 Figure 1

Thematic schema representing the conceptual patterns and relationships among all the perspectives and attitudes of specialists on the managent of patients with SLE. Specialists strived to achieve optimal outcomes for patients with SLE. They managed multiple roles to meet unmet needs. However, the perceived lack of high-quality evidence, and ill-defined aeitology contributed to their uncertainties in decision-making. To overcome these challenges specialists relied on their experiences gained throughout clinical training and advocated for their patients to have access to cutting-edge therapies and multidisciplinary care. Although, some felt that existing speciality silos structures restricted access to these services.

Conclusions Specialists endeavour to achieve optimal outcomes for patients with SLE but uncertainties in clinical decisions arise due to the ill-defined aetiology of SLE, lack of robust, consistent and implementable evidence, and speciality silo structures. Developing tools to support evidence-informed decisions, generating robust evidence to address clinical priorities, and establishing collaborative and multidisciplinary care pathways may support clinical decision making and management of a complex and heterogeneous disease, and help to minimise unwarranted variation in practice

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.