Article Text

Download PDFPDF

S1D:5 Sle disease activity index glucocorticosteroid index (sledai-2kg) identifies more responders than sledai-2k
  1. M Urowitz1,
  2. DD Gladman1,
  3. J Su1,
  4. NM Anderson1 and
  5. Z Touma2
  1. 1University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Toronto, Canada
  2. 2University of Toronto, Department of Rheumatology, Institute of Health Policy, Management Evaluation, Toronto Western H, Toronto, Canada


Background/purpose Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) is one of the most commonly used disease activity indices in clinical practice and research but this index doesn’t account for severity within each descriptor. Moreover, in clinical trials, the use of standard of care (SoC), which includes glucocorticosteroid (GCS) often confounds trial results.

We developed and validated a novel lupus disease activity index, SLEDAI-2K GCS (SLEDAI-2KG), that describes disease activity while accounting for GCS dose. SLEDAI-2KG has the same descriptors as SLEDAI-2K in addition to a new descriptor ‘GCS’ with different weight scores based on the dose of GCS. Furthermore, SLEDAI-2KG has a low administration burden and a simple scoring system similar to SLEDAI-2K. We aimed to compare the performance of SLEDAI-2K and SGI in identifying responders in response to SoC.

Methods Patients have been followed prospectively according to a standard protocol between January 2011 and January 2014, at a single lupus centre, with active disease (SLEDAI-2K≥6), on prednisone ≥10 mg/day, and with follow up visits within 5–24 months were studied. Treatment was determined based on the judgment of the treating rheumatologist.

Response to SoC therapy, at first follow up visit, was assessed by SLEDAI- 2K and SLEDAI-2KG. Responders were defined based on the decrease in SLEDAI-2K and SGI score by ≥4. The performance of SLEDAI-2K and SGI was also compared using different cut-off points; 5, 6 and 7. Descriptive analysis was used.

Results 111 patients met the inclusion criteria of the study and were further analysed. Patients’ characteristics are represented in table 1.

SLEDAI-2KG identified more responders at 6 months (94% vs 84%) and at 12 months (92% vs 76%) compared to SLEDAI-2K by cut off of 4. SLEDAI-2KG also identified more responders with cut off points 5, 6 and 7 (table 2).

Conclusion The novel index, SLEDAI-2KG, is superior to SLEDAI-2K in identifying responders at 6 and 12 months accounting for steroid dose and thus adjusting for severity within each descriptor of SLEDAI-2K. SLEDAI-2KG has the ability to enhance analyses in clinical trials to differentiate between responders on minimal and moderate/large doses of GCS.

Abstract S1D:5 Table 1

Patients characteristics

Abstract S1D:5 Table 2

Responders by SLEDAI-2K and SLEDAI-2KG in 111 patients

  • Glucocorticosteroid
  • Responders

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.