Article Text

Download PDFPDF

PS1:19 Biological dmards-induced lupus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single centre experience
  1. C Ancuta1,
  2. C Pomirleanu1,2,
  3. R Paiu2,
  4. C Iordache1,
  5. E Ancuta3 and
  6. R Chirieac4
  1. 1University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, Iasi, Romania
  2. 2Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Iasi, Romania
  3. 3Elena Doamna Clinical Hospital, Iasi, Romania
  4. 4Sanocare Medical and Research Centre, Iasi, Romania


Biological drugs (bDMARDs) have changed landscape and outcomes in various rheumatic conditions. Increased risk for infections, paradoxical reactions, autoimmunogenicity are widely acknowledged and may be responsible for treatment failure and switching among biologics.

Objective To assess drug-induced autoimmunity (serology, clinical significance) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with bDMARDs.

Patients and methods Longitudinal observational study in 246 bionaïve RA receiving their first bDMARD, anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) or non-TNF drugs, according to local treatment guidelines.

Disease activity, therapeutic response and serial autoantibody profiles (antinuclear (ANA), anti-dsDNA) were systematically assessed at baseline and every six months. Prevalence, clinical significance and therapeutic implications of ANA/anti-dsDNA specificities were further analysed (SPSS-19, p<0.05).

Results 214 RA received TNF inhibitors (56 infliximab, 65 adalimumab, 8 golimumab, 18 certolizumab, 67 etanercept) as first bDMADs and 32 different mechanism of action (10 rituximab, 7 abatacept, 15 tocilizumab). Overall, ANA seroconversion was demonstrated in 14.22% (35/246), while anti-dsDNA in 8.94% (22/246); no change in the immunological profile under golimumab, certolizumab, abatacept or rituximab.

Significantly higher rates of ANA were reported in infliximab-treated RA (30.53%) as compared to adalimumab (18.46%), etanercept (7.46%) and tocilizumab (6.66) (p<0.05); anti-dsDNA positivity was found in 10 infliximab (17.85%), 4 adalimumab (12.30%), 3 etanercept (4.47%) and one tocilizumab (6.66%), within an average of 36.5 (2–67) months.

ANA/anti-dsDNA positive status correlated with RA activity (DAS28-ESR) and loss of therapeutic response, concomitant DMARDs (leflunomide) and corticosteroids, administration adverse reactions (p<0.05).

Only four patients (1.62%; 4/246) were classified as drug-induced lupus. Three of them (infliximab, adalimumab, tocilizumab –induced) developed mild to moderate disease, with characteristic malar rash, serositis, haematological, elevated ANA and anti-dsDNA that normalised six months after bDMARD discontinuation; the fourth patient had adalimumab-induced lupus two months after drug initiation, with severe course (subacute extensive skin lesions, cytopenia, serositis) and fatal outcome.

Conclusions Development of ANA with or without anti-dsDNA specificity is typically associated with loss of response to bDMARD in RA and infrequently responsible for drug-induced lupus. Systematic evaluation of ANA/dsDNA is not recommended in routine practice, but essential in certain specific clinical settings (secondary non-responders or lupus-like symptoms).

  • Drug induced lupus
  • TNF inhibitors
  • Tocilizumab

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.