Article Text

Download PDFPDF

126 Anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies are not a marker for lupus nephritis
  1. Milena Mimica1,
  2. Loreto Massardo1,
  3. Marcela Bravo-Zehnder1,
  4. Patricia Gajardo1,
  5. Paula Burgos2 and
  6. Alfonso González3
  1. 1Centro de Biología Celular y Biomedicina (CEBICEM). Faculty of Science and Medicine, Universidad San Sebastián. Santiago, Chile
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Santiago, Chile
  3. 3Centro de Biología Celular y Biomedicina. Faculty of Science and Medicine, Universidad San Sebastián. Santiago, Chile. Centro de Envejecimiento y Regeneración (CARE), Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Santiago, Chile


Background Studies looking for clinical association of anti-ribosomal P (anti-P) autoantibodies and lupus nephritis (LN) describe contradictory results. It is clear that anti-dsDNA antibodies contribute to LN pathogenesis and their titers fluctuate together with those of anti-P, suggesting a linked generation or an anti-dsDNA cross-reaction with the P antigen. We reexamined the anti-P involvement in LN in relation with the possibility of anti-dsDNA and anti-P cross-reactivity

Methods Anti-P and anti-dsDNA were analyzed by ELISA. SLE sera (n=24) from patients with and with no LN were divided into 4 groups: A (anti-dsDNA positive, anti-P negative), B (both positive), C (anti-dsDNA negative, anti-P positive) and D (both negative). Anti-dsDNA cross-reaction was assessed against recombinant wild type and P-epitope-lacking P0 proteins using purified IgGs from SLE patients. Anti-P cross-reaction with dsDNA was analyzed testing affinity purified anti-P antibodies with an anti-dsDNA ELISA. LN biopsies (n=26) were classified according to ISN/RPS and relations to the anti-dsDNA and anti-P simultaneous presence were examined

Results Neither anti-dsDNA nor anti-P antibodies showed evidence of cross-reaction in any of the applied tests. LN biopsy proven patients: age (media±SD) 34±11 years; 88% female. No LN histologic class with anti-P relationship was observed: 9 patients had Class V (pure n=2) or mixed with Class III/IV (n=7); 1 patient was anti-P positive (p value>0.05). Two patients with LN had neither anti-dsDNA nor anti-P antibodies. The NIH Activity Index (8.9±4.9) and NIH chronicity index scores (1±1.1) and tubule-interstitial lesions were similar between anti-P positive or negative LN patients

Abstract 126 Table 1

Lupus nephritis histology class and anti-dsDNA and anti-P presence

Conclusions Cross-reactivity between anti-dsDNA and anti-P antibodies cannot explain the contradictory results of anti-P association with LN. Based on the present and our previous studies failing to find anti-P association with LN, it seems unlikely that anti-P contribute to the renal damage. Other factors beyond anti-dsDNA and anti-P might participate in LN

Funding Source(s): FONDECYT grant # 1160513 and CONICYT Basal grant # AFB170005

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.