Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Significant fatigue is reported by two-thirds of patients with SLE and severe fatigue by one-third. The assessment and treatment of fatigue remains a major challenge in SLE, especially in patients with no disease activity. Here, we suggest a practical algorithm for the management of fatigue in SLE. First, common but non–SLE-related causes of fatigue should be ruled out based on medical history, clinical and laboratory examinations. Then, presence of SLE-related disease activity or organ damage should be assessed. In patients with active disease, remission is the most appropriate therapeutic target while symptomatic support is needed in case of damage. Both anxiety and depression are major independent predictors of fatigue in SLE and require dedicated assessment and care with psychological counselling and pharmacological intervention if needed. This practical algorithm will help in improving the management of one the most common and complex patient complaints in SLE.
- lupus erythematosus
- systemic
- autoimmunity
- quality of life
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
SLE is a chronic autoimmune disease which may cause a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations as well as subjective symptoms1 2 such as fatigue. In SLE, fatigue is reported by 67% to 90% of patients1 3 4 and is rated as severe in up to one-third of patients using validated fatigue instruments, as shown in the recent multicentre FATILUP study.1 Also, fatigue is often reported as the most debilitating symptom of the disease by patients5 6 and leads to both altered health-related quality of life4 7–9 and significant work disability with tremendous indirect costs.3 The rational assessment and treatment of fatigue remains a major challenge in SLE,5 especially in patients without active disease. Noteworthy, fatigue is a highly multifactorial concept10 which, in the context of SLE, may be due either to lupus-related or non–lupus-related general causes. Importantly, those causes can also be intricate with significant psychobehavioural determinants. Here, we suggest a practical step-by-step algorithm for the general assessment and management of fatigue in SLE (figure 1).
Practical algorithm for the management of fatigue in patients with SLE.
Step 1: search for a general (non–lupus-related) cause of fatigue
In the primary care setting, a medical or psychiatric diagnosis can be found in at least two-thirds of patients presenting with acute fatigue. The most frequent causes of fatigue are summarised in table 1. It is crucial to understand the patient’s perspective, the detailed history of fatigue and the impact on the patient’s mood as well as on daily activities such as work, household chores, physical activity and leisure. Box 1 summarises the main questions to be asked when confronted with a patient with fatigue. A review of current medications is suggested, as some drugs may induce fatigue (eg, antihypertensive drugs such as beta blockers or sedatives). Lifestyle assessment is also essential: a significant association between smoking and fatigue has been reported in SLE.11–14 Also, obesity has been associated with increased fatigue both in the general population and SLE.15
Frequent causes of fatigue and suggested first-line assessment
Checklist for the initial assessment of fatigue in SLE
Characterisation of fatigue:
Onset: acute or insidious
Evolution: recent (<1 month), persistent (<6 months) or chronic (>6 months)
Presence of fatigue-free periods
Is fatigue ameliorated by rest?
Physical and mental impact of fatigue
Assessment of lifestyle (work, restrictive diet or obesity, physical activity), habitus (smoking, drinking) and sleep quality
Presence of concurrent manifestations
Lupus flare?
Any other (non–SLE-related) disorder?
List of medications
List of previous or current associated medical conditions
A full clinical examination of the heart, lung, thyroid and nervous system16 is crucial. For women, a gynaecological examination is also recommended, especially in case of anaemia.17 18 Laboratory tests should rule out most common causes of fatigue (box 1) such as inflammation and infection, anaemia, renal or hepatic failure, viral hepatitis or HIV infection, and major endocrine or metabolic complications such as abnormal calcemia, hypothyroidism, diabetes or adrenal insufficiency (especially in patients who recently stopped glucocorticoids). Cancer screening should be updated, according to current guidelines, and indirect signs of malignancy (anorexia, weight loss and lymphadenopathy) should be carefully searched for. Although controversial,19 vitamin D deficiency has been associated with fatigue in SLE.20 In an observational study of 80 patients with SLE, vitamin D supplementation improved fatigue in participants.21 Also, vitamin D supplementation was associated with a decrease in fatigue scores in a randomised controlled trial in juvenile-onset SLE.22
Step 2: objective assessment of fatigue using validated PROs
Because fatigue is a highly subjective symptom, the standardised assessment of fatigue using validated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is an important step. The use of validated PROs also allows for an individual follow-up of fatigue intensity and symptoms over time, and may help in underlining the benefit of a therapeutic intervention at the patient level. It is also a way to show that the physician is genuinely interested in understanding and treating the cause of fatigue, which is important from the patient’s perspective, and helps in establishing a trusting physician–patient relationship. Among a total of 16 different fatigue PROs which have been used in SLE, the FSS (Fatigue Severity Scale) and the short-FSS are the most used ones, but the MFI (Multi-dimensional Fatigue Inventory) and the Fatigue-VAS have also been used, although less commonly16 (see table 2). The FACIT-Fatigue score is commonly used in clinical trials but has been infrequently used in routine clinical practice.1
Most frequently used fatigue patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in SLE
Step 3: identifying a lupus-related cause of fatigue
Fatigue can be a manifestation of active SLE but can also be related to organ damage (figure 2). The relationship between disease activity and fatigue remains controversial in SLE and has been shown to be less strong than with other factors such as anxiety or depression.1 23 24 Its association with serological markers (C3, anti-dsDNA antibodies) is also controversial.11
Main determinants of fatigue in patients with SLE.
Fatigue has been associated with several SLE-specific organ manifestations:
Several studies found an association between neurological involvement,11 25 including white matter hyperintensities,26 and fatigue.
Renal failure can be an important cause of fatigue. It is crucial to assess whether it is related to active kidney disease or to chronic lesions (damage).27 28
Cardiac failure is an obvious cause of fatigue.
Hepatic failure and cirrhosis can (rarely) be due to lupus hepatitis, and overlap with autoimmune hepatitis or less frequently sclerosing cholangitis.29 30
Other clinical manifestations of SLE have been associated with fatigue: in the FATILUP study,1 we found arthritis and oral ulcers to be individual SLE Disease Activity Index score components associated with severe fatigue. This may underline a more specific role for painful disease manifestations in SLE.11 23
Finally, the prevalence of fibromyalgia is estimated to range between 6.2% and 22% of patients with SLE31 32 and has been strongly associated with fatigue.33 Sjögren’s syndrome should also be thought of in patients with sicca syndrome and has been associated with significant fatigue across several studies.34 35
Step 4: looking for intricate psychological determinants
Emotional and functional well-beings as well as abnormal illness-related behaviours strongly correlate with depression and fatigue in SLE.1 36 37 Pain, stress and depression have been shown to be the most important predictors of fatigue in patients with SLE38 and their intensity and consequences should be assessed, with the help of a psychologist or psychiatrist if needed. Mood disorders are reported in up to 13% of patients with SLE and attributed to SLE in about 40% of cases.39 Sleep disorders are also common in the general population as well as in SLE, and have been associated with fatigue40–42 and depression.41
Towards a practical management of fatigue in patients with SLE
In patients with significant disease activity, the main therapeutic target is remission (or alternatively low-disease activity) and reaching these goals can be sufficient to improve fatigue.43 44 However, a common situation is the presence of significant fatigue contrasting with the absence of disease activity or any underlying organic cause. In these patients, immunosuppressive treatment escalation is not indicated and other non-pharmacological interventions such as psychological and behavioural assessment or physical activity workshops should be favoured.45 Importantly, lack of optimal physical activity as well as sedentary behaviour have been associated with fatigue in SLE.44 46 47 Physical exercise is recommended for the management of pain and fatigue in patients with inflammatory arthritis in the last European League Against Rheumatism recommendations.48 Physical activity has been shown to improve fatigue in patients with SLE,44 49 with more time spent in moderate or high physical activity associated with less fatigue.50 Patients with SLE with otherwise unexplained fatigue should undergo dedicated psychological assessment, and behavioural issues should be specifically taken care of using appropriate psychological counselling51–55 and pharmacological intervention, when needed. The exact benefit of antidepressants on fatigue is difficult to assess in SLE because there is no specific trial, but there is no reason to believe that those treatments would not be appropriate, keeping in mind the potential interaction with hydroxychloroquine, which may lead to QT prolongation. Tobacco smoking cessation should be encouraged as it significantly reduces therapeutic efficacy of many drugs and could promote flares.14 Last but not least, hydroxychloroquine observance should be evaluated and if needed, non-scheduled hydroxychloroquine serum concentrations should be measured to verify therapeutic adherence and adjust daily posology.56 57
Conclusion
Significant fatigue is reported by two-thirds of patients with SLE and severe fatigue by one-third.1 As in the general population, general non–SLE-related causes of fatigue should be ruled out. Then, it is important to assess whether fatigue may be related to disease activity or damage. In the former situation, disease remission is the most appropriate therapeutic target, with an emphasis on painful manifestations. Importantly, both anxiety and depression are major independent predictors of fatigue in several studies. These manifestations should be thoroughly assessed and taken care of using appropriate psychological counselling and pharmacological intervention, when needed. We believe this practical algorithm will help in improving the management of one of the most common and complex patient complaints in SLE.
References
Footnotes
Twitter @Lupusreference
Contributors All authors have equally contributed to this work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement No additional data are available.