Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O33 Per-protocol repeat kidney biopsy portends relapse and long-term outcome in incident cases of proliferative lupus nephritis
Free
  1. Ioannis Parodis1,
  2. Christina Adamichou2,
  3. Selda Aydin3,
  4. Alvaro Gomez1,
  5. Nathalie Demoulin4,
  6. Julia Weinmann-Menke5,
  7. Frédéric A Houssiau2 and
  8. Farah Tamirou2
  1. 1Dept. of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  2. 2Rheumatology Dept., Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Pôle de Pathologies Rhumatismales Inflammatoires et Systémiques, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels
  3. 3Pathology Dept., Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels
  4. 4Division of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  5. 5Dept. of Nephrology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Abstract

Background In patients with Lupus Nephritis (LN), clinical response to treatment and renal histopathology have been shown to be discordant. We investigated whether per-protocol repeat renal biopsies are predictive of LN relapses and long-term impairment of renal function.

Methods Forty-two patients with an incident biopsy-proven active proliferative (class III/IV ± V) LN from the LN database of the Université catholique de Louvain were included in the present retrospective study. Per-protocol repeat kidney biopsies were performed in all patients after a median time of 24.3 (IQR: 21.3–26.2) months. The NIH activity index (AI) and chronicity index (CI) scores were assessed in both baseline and repeat biopsies.

Results Despite a moderate correlation between urinary protein/creatinine (U-P/C) ratios and AI scores at repeat biopsy (r=0.48; P=0.001), ten patients (23.8%) with U-P/C ratios <1.0 g/g still had a high degree of histological activity (AI score >3; figure 1). High AI scores in repeat biopsies were associated with an increased probability and/or shorter time to renal relapse (N=11) following the repeat biopsy (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.1–1.3; P=0.007), independently of proteinuria levels. High NIH CI scores in repeat biopsies were associated with a sustained increase in serum creatinine levels corresponding to ≥120% of the baseline value (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1–2.9; P=0.016) through a median follow-up time of 131.5 (IQR: 73.8–178.2) months. Baseline AI/CI scores were not predictive of these outcomes.

Conclusions Our results highlight the usefulness of per-protocol repeat biopsies as an integral part of the treatment evaluation, also in patients who have shown adequate clinical response.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.