Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P21 Investigation of possible pathogenic autoantibodies in membranous lupus nephritis
  1. Filipa Farinha1,
  2. Ruth J Pepper2,
  3. Chris Wincup1,
  4. Alan Salama2,
  5. David A Isenberg1 and
  6. Anisur Rahman1
  1. 1Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London
  2. 2Centre for Nephrology, University College London-Royal Free Campus, London, UK


Background The pathogenesis of membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) is poorly understood. Our objectives were to investigate, in patients with MLN, the presence of antibodies to nucleosomes and histones, which have been linked to the pathogenesis of proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN); and antibodies against phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R), previously identified in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).

Methods Single-centre study, using banked serum samples from patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (LN). For each patient, we aimed to identify two paired serum samples – one at the date of renal biopsy (active nephritis) and one when LN was quiescent. Antibodies were detected with indirect ELISA. Positivity cut-offs were 20 U/mL for anti-nucleosomes and PLA2R, and 40 U/mL for anti-histones antibodies. Levels of antibodies in paired active and quiescent LN samples were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the levels between independent LN groups.

Results Forty-nine active serum samples (13 pure MLN, 22 PLN and 14 mixed) and 41 paired quiescent samples were tested for anti-nucleosome and anti-PLA2R antibodies; and 44 active (13 pure MLN, 17 PLN and 14 mixed) and 38 paired quiescent samples were tested for anti-histones antibodies. Anti-nucleosome antibodies were present in 98% of active-LN patients. Total median level was 190.70 (IQR 681), with no significant difference between the three groups (p=0.730). During quiescent LN, levels dropped significantly in PLN but not in pure MLN patients (figure 1). Anti-histone antibodies were positive in 32% of active-LN patients, with no significant difference between groups (p=0.828); their levels showed a similar trend to that of anti-nucleosomes (figure 1). Antibodies to PLA2R were negative in all patients.

Abstract P21 Figure 1

Anti-nucleosome and anti-histone antibody levels (U/mL) in patients with mixed, proliferative and membranous LN, when the nephritis was active (1) and quiescent (2)

Conclusions Anti-nucleosome and anti-histone antibody levels did not reflect disease activity in MLN. Anti-PLA2R antibodies were absent in these patients. None of these antibodies is likely to be playing a preponderant role in MLN pathogenesis.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.