Discussion
We found that the widely acknowledged phenotype variation among patients with SLE also applied for Danish patients of largely Caucasian ancestry. However, the variation was not random as we demonstrated clustering of respectively internal and external clinical manifestations among the individual patients with SLE. As for the whole group of patients with SLE, we were able to identify at least three phenotypical subsets that respectively comprised mainly neurological, serosal and mucosal involvement (A); renal, haematological and immunological involvement (B); and skin involvement (C). Genetic variation may only explain phenotype variation to some extent,22 and since smoking has been considered a risk factor for SLE23 this study investigated if smoking was associated with any subsets of SLE. We did show that the two subsets with the highest degree of mucocutaneous and neurological involvement had the highest proportion of patients reporting a history of smoking. The subset with the lowest proportion of ever smokers was distinctly characterised by having the highest occurrence of renal disorder and no occurrence of neurological disorder as defined in the revised ACR 1997 classification criteria.16
These observations prompted further investigation of the association between smoking exposure and discrete manifestations of SLE. We observed a positive association between the number of pack-years and cutaneous manifestation, that is, photosensitivity and discoid rash. Previous studies of associations between smoking and SLE disease manifestations have found strong associations between cutaneous manifestations and smoking.24 In a study comprising mainly patients with cutaneous types of lupus erythematosus, smoking was distinctly associated with cutaneous manifestations and not SLE.25 In a Canadian SLE cohort, ever smoking was also found to associate with discoid rash and photosensitivity11 but smoking did not associate with cutaneous damage as suggested by others.15
In this cohort, we found an association between high exposure of pack-years and neurological disorder, which seemed equally driven by psychosis and seizures. Adjusted analyses showed that this association was independent of other manifestations associated to smoking and neurological disorder such as photosensitivity and discoid rash. Serositis was most prevalent in the patient cluster characterised by a high prevalence of neurological disorder and smoking as also reported by others,26 27 but was not by itself associated with smoking. Smoking has also been associated to neuropsychiatric entities of organ damage as well as with general progression of damage.28 However, we did not address aspects of damage in this study but focused on the association between smoking and defining features of SLE as we expect the SLE phenotype to be of central importance in determining what types of damage that may accrue as exemplified by the increased risk of cerebral vascular events in patients with SLE with other neuropsychiatric manifestations.29
Since smoking by many is considered a risk factor for SLE13 30 and nephritis being a prominent feature of SLE, it was intriguing in this study to find a negative association between smoking >10 pack-years and renal disorder as defined by persistent proteinuria according to the ACR classification criteria. As the number of pack-years was associated with increasing age and male sex, we performed adjusted analyses that furthermore indicated a dose-dependent relationship between smoking exposure and history of proteinuria. Not many studies have directly addressed this association; in one study, cigarette consumption was not associated with lupus nephritis.31 Active or recent smoking has in ANA-positive individuals been associated with plasma cytokine levels suggestive of a proinflammatory effect of smoking.32 However, smoking may also have various immune-suppressive effects that are mediated by reduced neutrophil and antigen-presenting activity.33 To this end, it is of interest that we also found that history of haematological disorder, including lymphopenia, and anti-dsDNA positivity was inversely related to an increasing number of pack-years.
Studies of the association of smoking with autoantibodies such as anti-dsDNA antibodies, a serological hallmark of SLE, are conflicting. Anti-dsDNA-positive SLE has been associated with current and heavy smoking,13 34 whereas others have not found such association.35 36 Varying frequencies of anti-dsDNA positivity in the studies mentioned (30%–80%) may compromise direct comparison. We did not find smoking to be associated with ever presence of anti-Smith antibodies in line with a previous study.24 Nor did we find antiphospholipid antibodies to be associated with smoking exposure; this in contrast to others.36
Associations between smoking exposure and various autoantibody profiles are probably just as heterogeneous as our study has demonstrated for clinical manifestations. However, associations between autoantibody production and phenotypic differentiation could be mediated by ineffective clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells due to smoking.37 Indeed, it has been shown that smoking causes dose-dependent cell death signalling: lower doses cause apoptosis, whereas higher doses induce necrosis.38 Induction of apoptosis, stimulation of T cells and enhancing of phototoxic effect of smoking may thus play important pathogenic roles for manifestations of SLE. Another smoking-related mechanism that may induce overlapping clinical and serological phenotypes is post-translational modification of autoantigens.34
In our population of patients with SLE, there was a clear inverse relation between smoking and arthritis which is non-erosive as defined by the ACR classification criteria. Contrary to this, smoking in subjects that have shared epitope significantly increases the risk of anti-citrullinated antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis,39 which is characterised by increased risk of erosive joint involvement and extra-articular manifestations. These findings may thus suggest different pathophysiological mechanisms of arthritis in these two patient populations.
A strength of this study is the relatively high number of subjects with detailed clinical and exposure data registered in the DANBIO registry that reflects Danish routine practice of patients treated for inflammatory joint and connective tissue disease with high coverage.19 40 This enables us to register and study common and less common disease manifestations on a national level. Limitations of this study include incomplete data for some of the enrolled patients, which however did not differ with respect to demography and clinical features compared with the patients studied. Limitations also include: potential regional and temporal variations regarding used assay systems, that data on damage were not included in this report and that definitions of organ involvements were restricted to the defining items used for SLE classification, for example, the definition of neurologic manifestations by seizures and psychoses only. Our cohort comprised 92% Caucasians and associations may therefore not be generalised to non-Caucasian populations which may differ with respect to clinical and serological manifestations.41 Our study did not contain a validation cohort but did corroborate various previous findings of associations between smoking and SLE disease manifestations. Lack of smoking data before each specific disease manifestation might also weaken the association as may potential recall bias. However, to partly address the issue of temporality, we used accumulated smoking history and disease manifestations while adjusting for age. As for our findings of inverse clinical associations to smoking, these need to be replicated also taking into account the role of medications and treatment response since smoking has been shown to negatively impact treatment response in cutaneous42 as well as systemic lupus.24
Although disease mechanisms may vary between discrete disease manifestations and are not yet fully understood, the differentiated clinical associations with smoking observed by others and us may suggest biological roles for smoking in the development of specific SLE phenotypes. They do also prompt interest for specific and functional studies of potential interactions between genetics and risk exposures to address pathoimmunological implications in patients with diverse disease manifestations and potentially allow for targeted therapies, including personalised medicine, to develop and being implemented.43 Our findings support the conceptual feasibility of such approaches although causal inferences cannot be deduced from our study.
In conclusion, our findings of differentiated associations between smoking and various subsets of patients with SLE corroborate the notion of SLE being a clinically heterogeneous disease and suggest that this should be taken into account in future studies of SLE risk factors by stratification of clinical phenotypes.