Article Text

Download PDFPDF

1122 Validation of a novel lupus multivariable outcome score as an outcome measure for systemtic lupus erythematosus trials
  1. Michal Abrahamowicz1 and
  2. Peter E Lipsky2
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  2. 2AMPEL BioSolutions and the RILITE Research Institute, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA


Background Development of effective new Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) treatments requires a validated responder index responsive to clinically meaningful change and relevant to clinical practice. To address this challenge, we have recently developed a new Lupus Multivariable Outcome Score (LuMOS) to optimize discrimination between outcomes of actively treated patients versus those on placebo.1 We now report on external validation of LuMOS in two independent SLE clinical trials.

Methods Validation was carried out in the Illuminate trials that evaluated tabalumab (TB) in SLE. All participants in both Illuminate 1 and 2 trials met the ACR classification criteria for SLE and all were included in our analyses. To adapt LuMOS for use with laboratory results assessed on different platforms than used in the trials of belimumab employed to generate the original LuMOS outcome score.1 we calculated a standardized score using z-score transformations. For validation, in each of the Illuminate trials, we calculated LuMOS scores at week 52 for all participants receiving either placebo or one of 2 dosage regimens of TB. Cohen D Effect Size (ES), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), assessed the ability of LuMOS to discriminate between outcomes in active treatment groups versus placebo, and compared it with SRI-5 responder index used in the original trials.

Results LuMOS using standardized z-score transformed laboratory data worked comparably to the original LuMOS model in the analyses of original belimumab trials and was then applied to the Illuminate data sets. LuMOS-based ES for both TB groups in both trials indicated highly significant (p<0.0001), moderately strong treatment effects (ES>0.4), in contrast to weak effects (ES<0.25) based on SRI-5, that were statistically non-significant for Illuminate-1, as reflected by the 95% CI’s that included 0 (table 1).

Abstract 1122 Table 1

Comparison of Effect Sizes for TB vs Placebo groups between LuMOS and SRI-5

Conclusion LuMOS improves the ability to detect statistically significant treatment effects. Further validation in SLE trials of non-B cell directed treatments is necessary to document utility as an outcome measure independent of drug mechanism.

Acknowledgement Support from Lupus Research Alliance.


  1. Abrahamowicz et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:1450-58.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.