Table 1

Potential treatment EMs for SRI-4: characteristics that need to be balanced across trials

Baseline characteristicExpected effect-modifying relationship (relative to placebo) with outcomeAnticipated bias (direction and magnitude) for indirect comparison*Rationale for anticipated bias
(values are belimumab trials vs anifrolumab trials)
Adjustment in model
SLEDAI-2KTreatment effect is larger in populations with higher SLEDAI-2K valuesEmbedded ImageModerate/large bias in favour of anifrolumabStrong treatment EM with moderate difference (mean of 10.4 vs 11.3)Balance mean SLEDAI-2K across trials
RaceTreatment effect is smaller in Black African ancestry race than other racesEmbedded ImageNegligible bias in favour of anifrolumabModerate treatment EM with small difference (20% vs 14% Black African Ancestry)Not adjusted in the base-case analysis†
C3Treatment effect is larger among patients with low C3 concentrationEmbedded ImageModerate bias in favour of belimumabModerate treatment EM with moderate difference (49% vs 36% low C3)Balance proportion with low C3 across trials
C4Treatment effect is larger among patients with low C4 concentrationEmbedded ImageModerate bias in favour of belimumabModerate treatment EM with moderate difference (37% vs 23% low C4)Balance proportion with low C4 across trials
Anti-dsDNATreatment effect is larger among anti-dsDNA positive patientsEmbedded ImageSmall bias in favour of belimumabSmall treatment EM with large difference (71% vs 40% positive)Balance proportion anti-dsDNA positive‡
Glucocorticoid useTreatment effect is larger among patients with any glucocorticoid useEmbedded ImageNegligible bias in favour of belimumabModerate treatment EM with small difference (88% vs 82% with any use)Not adjusted in the base-case analysis†
Smoking statusTreatment effect is smaller in smokers?Bias for characteristic is unknownSmoking status is not reported for any trial in the evidence baseNone
BMITreatment effect is smaller in patients with high BMI?Bias for characteristic is unknownBMI is only available for some trials (but appears similar across trials that report it)§None
  • *Arrow thickness indicates the strength of the effect.

  • †Characteristic was adjusted for in sensitivity analyses.

  • ‡Positivity in belimumab trials defined based on 30 IU/mL threshold, while positivity in anifrolumab trials was defined based on 15 IU/mL threshold. While it was possible to alter the definition in the belimumab trials to match the definition in the anifrolumab trials, a 15 IU/mL threshold was not clinically meaningful for the belimumab trials.

  • §BMI of 27.6 kg/m2 for pooled TULIP trials (reported in Bruce et al18) and BMI of 25.4 kg/m2 for pooled belimumab trials.

  • Anti-dsDNA, anti–double-stranded DNA antibody; BMI, body mass index; C3/C4, complement component 3/4; EM, effect modifier; SLEDAI-2K, SLE Disease Activity Index 2000; SRI-4, SLE Responder Index-4.