Age-dependent decreases in DNA methyltransferase levels and low transmethylation micronutrient levels synergize to promote overexpression of genes implicated in autoimmunity and acute coronary syndromes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2009.12.008Get rights and content

Abstract

T cell DNA methylation levels decline with age, activating genes such as KIR and TNFSF7 (CD70), implicated in lupus-like autoimmunity and acute coronary syndromes. The mechanisms causing age-dependent DNA demethylation are unclear. Maintenance of DNA methylation depends on DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) and intracellular S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) levels, and is inhibited by S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). SAM levels depend on dietary micronutrients including folate and methionine. SAH levels depend on serum homocysteine concentrations. T cell Dnmt1 levels also decline with age. We hypothesized that age-dependent Dnmt1 decreases synergize with low folate, low methionine or high homocysteine levels to demethylate and activate methylation-sensitive genes. T cells from healthy adults ages 22–81, stimulated and cultured with low folate, low methionine, or high homocysteine concentrations showed demethylation and overexpression of KIR and CD70 beginning at age ∼50 and increased further with age. The effects were reproduced by Dnmt1 knockdowns in T cells from young subjects. These results indicate that maintenance of T cell DNA methylation patterns is more sensitive to low folate and methionine levels in older than younger individuals, due to low Dnmt1 levels, and that homocysteine further increases aberrant gene expression. Thus, attention to proper nutrition may be particularly important in the elderly.

Introduction

DNA methylation is a post-synthetic modification that silences gene expression. DNA methylation patterns are established during differentiation, and serve to suppress genes unnecessary or detrimental to the function of any given cell, but for which the cell expresses activating transcription factors. DNA methylation is particularly important in T lymphocytes, which differentiate throughout life into multiple subsets with distinct functions but express a partially overlapping repertoire of transcription factors. Consequently, some subset-specific genes are silenced primarily by DNA methylation. For example, inhibiting T lymphocyte DNA methylation activates the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ in Th2 cells, the Th2 cytokine IL-4 in Th1 cells, the cytotoxic molecule perforin in CD4 cells and the KIR gene family, normally confined to natural killer (NK) lymphocytes, on CD4 and CD8 cells (Basu et al., 2009, Liu et al., 2009a, Lu et al., 2003, Richardson, 2007). These studies support the importance of DNA methylation in maintaining subset-specific T lymphocyte gene expression.

DNA methylation patterns must be replicated each time a cell divides. However, the maintenance of DNA methylation patterns deteriorates with age in most cells, causing aberrant methylation of some CpG islands that can lead to malignant transformation, as well as demethylation of other regions that promotes gene overexpression (Yung and Julius, 2008). In T cells a small number of CpG islands methylate with age, suppressing gene expression (Tra et al., 2002). However, the predominant effect is a decline in total deoxymethylcytosine (dmC) content, causing aberrant overexpression of genes normally silenced by methylation (Richardson, 2003). The mechanisms causing T cell DNA demethylation are important to understand, because the demethylation may contribute to the development of lupus-like autoimmunity as well as acute coronary syndromes, by causing aberrant overexpression of genes including the KIR gene family, perforin, CD70, IFN-γ, LFA-1 and others (Jones and Chen, 2006, Kaplan et al., 2004, Liu et al., 2009b, Liu et al., 2009a, Lu et al., 2002, Lu et al., 2005, Nakajima et al., 2003).

DNA methylation patterns are replicated during mitosis by the maintenance DNA methyltransferase Dnmt1. Dnmt1 binds proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the replication fork and recognizes CpG pairs (Iida et al., 2002). If the parent DNA strand is methylated, Dnmt1 catalyzes the transfer of the methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the corresponding dC in the daughter strand, producing 5-methylcytosine (mC) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) (Ross and Poirier, 2002):SAM+-CpG-Dnmt1SAH+-mCpG-.

The forward velocity of this reaction is directly proportional to SAM concentrations and Dnmt1 activity, and inversely proportional to SAH:V=k[Dnmt1][SAM][SAH]

T cell Dnmt1 levels decrease with age, which contributes to the decline in overall dmC content (Zhang et al., 2002). However, diet is also important in replicating DNA methylation patterns, and is a mechanism by which the environment can modify the epigenome. SAM levels depend on micronutrients such as folate and methionine (Met) (Ross and Poirier, 2002), and restricting dietary methyl donors can demethylate DNA in tissues like the liver (Pogribny et al., 1995) and peripheral blood leukocytes (Rampersaud et al., 2000). SAH levels are also affected by diet. SAH concentrations are dependent on homocysteine (Hcy) levels, and folate is required for the metabolism of Hcy to Met (Ross and Poirier, 2002). Elevated serum Hcy levels contribute to DNA demethylation in conditions such as chronic renal failure, and folate supplementation can reverse this effect (Ingrosso et al., 2003). How dietary transmethylation micronutrients, Hcy and decreased Dnmt1 levels interact to cause decreases in DNA methylation and aberrant gene overexpression in aging is unknown.

We hypothesized that decreases in folate or Met, increases in Hcy, and age-dependent decreases in Dnmt1 levels may be synergistic in inhibiting T cell DNA methylation. We therefore cultured T cells from healthy young and older individuals, as well as T cell Dnmt1 “knockdowns”, in media containing variable amounts of folate, Met, and/or Hcy, and examined the effects on the expression and methylation of genes normally suppressed by DNA methylation. The results suggest a potentially important mechanism increasing sensitivity of older people, and perhaps people with some forms of autoimmunity, to adverse effects from a diet poor in methyl donors.

Section snippets

Subjects

Healthy men and women ages 22–81 were recruited from the Arthritis clinic of the University of Michigan, the Human Subjects Core of the University of Michigan Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, and by advertising. The older cohort (age >50) was 50% women, 50% men and 90% Caucasian, 10% African–American. The younger cohort (age <50) was 44% male, 56% female and 88% Caucasian, 12% Asian. Subjects with autoimmune or other inflammatory conditions were specifically excluded, as

T cells from older people demethylate and express KIR genes when folate or Met concentrations are limiting

KIR genes are normally expressed by NK cells and a senescent CD28 T cell subset, but not on normal T cells (Liu et al., 2009b). However, inhibiting DNA methylation in vitro with the irreversible DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine induces KIR gene expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from healthy young people (Liu et al., 2009a). We used a similar protocol to compare the effects of folate and Met restriction on KIR gene expression in T cells from healthy subjects with a wide age

Discussion

These studies demonstrate an age-dependent demethylation and overexpression of genes normally suppressed by DNA methylation when T cells are cultured in media with low Met or folate concentrations, and that Hcy potentiates the effect. While multiple age-dependent changes in transmethylation biochemistry may contribute, age-dependent decreases in Dnmt1 are likely important, since Dnmt1 siRNA knockdowns in T cells from young people reproduced the effect. T cells also express DNA methyltransferase

Authorship

Dr. YePeng Li designed and performed the majority of the experiments reported. Dr. Ying Liu provided guidance, data interpretation and protocols for the Dnmt1, KIR and CD70 analyses, and Dr. Strickland provided guidance and data interpretation for the cell culture and flow cytometry studies. Dr. Richardson conceived and supervised the work, and was responsible for writing the paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Ailing Wu and Mr. Robert Hinderer for assistance with the RT-PCR, DNA isolation and bisulfite sequencing, and Ms. Cheryl Glaser for expert secretarial assistance. This work was supported by PHS Grants AR42525, AR056370, ES015214 and AG025877, a Merit grant from the Dept. of Veterans Affairs and the University of Michigan Pepper Center (NIA P30AG024824).

References (36)

  • D. Basu et al.

    Stimulatory and inhibitory killer immunoglobulin-like receptor molecules are expressed and functional on lupus T cells

    J. Immunol.

    (2009)
  • Chen, Y., Gorelik, G.J., Strickland, F.M., Richardson, B.C., 2010. Decreased ERK and JNK signaling contribute to gene...
  • E. Cornacchia et al.

    Hydralazine and procainamide inhibit T cell DNA methylation and induce autoreactivity

    J. Immunol.

    (1988)
  • L. Denis et al.

    Genetic diversity of KIR natural killer cell markers in populations from France, Guadeloupe, Finland, Senegal and Reunion

    Tissue Antigens

    (2005)
  • T. Iida et al.

    PCNA clamp facilitates action of DNA cytosine methyltransferase 1 on hemimethylated DNA

    Genes Cells

    (2002)
  • B. Jones et al.

    Inhibition of IFN-gamma transcription by site-specific methylation during T helper cell development

    EMBO J.

    (2006)
  • M.J. Kaplan et al.

    Demethylation of promoter regulatory elements contributes to perforin overexpression in CD4+ lupus T cells

    J. Immunol.

    (2004)
  • G. Li et al.

    Epigenetic mechanisms of age-dependent KIR2DL4 expression in T cells

    J. Leukoc. Biol.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Bioactive compounds in the management of nutritional disorders

      2022, Role of Nutrigenomics in Modern-day Healthcare and Drug Discovery
    • Environmental and drug-induced lupus

      2021, Lahita’s Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Epigenetics of autoimmune diseases

      2019, Prognostic Epigenetics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text