Abstract
Although many carcinogens are mutagens, there is no direct evidence that the cancer-cell phenotype is the result of gene mutation. Transplantation experiments have strongly indicated that malignant cells can arise or revert to the normal phenotype in the absence of mutation. It is suggested that damage to DNA followed by repair triggers the epigenetic changes in gene expression which are responsible for malignancy. We previously proposed that methylation of specific DNA sequences adjacent to structural genes determines whether or not transcription will occur. Specific methylases are required for the switching on of genes and for the stable maintenance of the methylated state, which provides a basis for the control of gene expression in differentiated cells. It is now seen that damage to DNA followed by repair, just before or just after DNA replication, can lead to the loss of methyl groups. This can induce a switch in gene activity which is heritable, but potentially reversible. The known large difference in the probability of malignant transformation in cells of rodents and large mammals is hard to explain if mutation is responsible. On the other hand, this new theory provides an explanation for this difference, since the probability of epigenetic changes in gene activity will depend on the activity of methylating enzymes and the rate of excision repair. The theory is supported by the evidence that excision repair is more efficient in cultured fibroblasts from large long-lived animals than from small short-lived ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Additional information
This paper is in large part based on the ideas of my colleague J. E. Pugh. He first discussed the theory at a meeting of the Genetical Society of Great Britain in November 1977 (see Pugh & Holliday, 1978), but did not consider that its publication in full was justified.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holliday, R. A new theory of carcinogenesis. Br J Cancer 40, 513–522 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1979.216
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1979.216
This article is cited by
-
Targeting epigenetic regulators for cancer therapy: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2019)
-
Associating cellular epigenetic models with human phenotypes
Nature Reviews Genetics (2017)
-
Causes of Aging Are Likely to be Many: Robin Holliday and Changing Molecular Approaches to Cell Aging, 1963–1988
Journal of the History of Biology (2014)
-
Epigenetics comes of age in the twentyfirst century
Journal of Genetics (2002)