Validity of LupusQoL-China for the assessment of health related quality of life in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

PLoS One. 2013 May 23;8(5):e63795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063795. Print 2013.

Abstract

Objectives: To adapt and assess the validity and reliability of LupusQoL for use in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: Debriefing interviews of subjects with SLE guided the language modifications of the tool. The process of adaptation proceeded according to the guideline and pre-testing results of LupusQoL-China. 220 SLE patients completed LupusQoL-China and a generic preference-based measurement of health EuroQoL scale (EQ-5D), and 20 patients repeated them after 2 weeks. Internal consistency (ICR) and test-retest (TRT) reliability, convergent and discriminant validity were examined. Factor analysis and Rasch analysis were performed.

Results: The mean (SD) age of the 208 subjects with SLE was 33.93 (± 9.19) years. ICR and TRT of the eight domains ranged from 0.811 to 0.965 and 0.836 to 0.974, respectively. The LupusQoL-China domains demonstrated substantial evidence of construct validity when compared with equivalent domains on the EQ-5D (physical health and usual activities r = -0.63, pain and pain/discomfort r = -0.778, emotional health and anxiety/depression r = -0.761, planning and usual activities r = -0.560). Most LupusQoL-China domains could discriminate patients with varied disease activities and end-organ damage (according to SELENA-SLEDAI and SLICC-DI). The principal component analysis revealed six factors, and confirmatory factor analysis result of which is similar to eight factors model.

Conclusions: These results provide evidence that the LupusQoL-China is valid as a disease-specific HRQoL assessment tool for Chinese patients with SLE.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • China
  • Culture
  • Humans
  • Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic / psychology*
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life / psychology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*
  • Taiwan
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81072469; No.30671946) and Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No.09ZR1417600). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.